What is the real truth of Brahmaji's marriage with his daughter is a subject of research even today. This needs to be considered. Brahma's name appears significantly in Indian mythological history, while Vishnu and Shiva are considered superior to him in popular society. Over time, one of the many reasons for Brahma being pushed to the margins is Savitri's curse and the second reason is that when Lord Sadashiv sent Vishnu and Brahma to fathom the universe, Brahma returned and said untruths to Sadashiv.
*However, the belief is spread in the popular society that Brahma had married his daughter Saraswati, hence he is not worshipped. Now how true this is is a matter of research. Some scholars reject it as a misconception. However, it is also true that it is mentioned at one place in the Puranas that Brahma's wife Saraswati, the goddess of knowledge, was not his daughter. One of his daughters was also named Saraswati due to which this confusion arose.
*According to mythological belief, Brahma's daughter Saraswati was married to Lord Vishnu, while Brahma's wife Saraswati was the goddess of learning whose mother's name was Mahalakshmi and whose brother's name was Vishnu. The goddess named 'Lakshmi' whom Vishnu married was the daughter of sage Bhrigu.
*It is believed that Brahmaji had 5 wives – Savitri, Gayatri, Shraddha, Medha and Saraswati. In this, mention of Savitri and Saraswati is found at most places. It is also believed that in the absence of Savitri during the Yagya in Pushkar, Brahma performed the Yagya by marrying Gayatri, a learned woman who knew the Vedas. Angered by this, Savitri cursed Brahma not to be worshiped in the world. Experts in Gurjar history believe that Gayatri Mata was a Gurjar woman.
* It is said that these four verses have been misinterpreted since the medieval period to defame Brahmaji either inadvertently or not:
The speech is the daughter of the self-born and the mind is killed.
We have heard that a kṣatriya desired what he did not desire. (Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam 3/12/28)
वाचं दुहितरं तन्वीं स्वयंभूर्हतीं मन:।
अकामां चकमे क्षत्त्: सकाम् इति न: श्रुतम् ॥(श्रीमदभागवत् 3/12/28)
The Creator ran to his daughter
Others say that it is heaven
He became angry and approached the ghost Rohit
The gods saw him
“The Creator does what is not done.”
They will kill him who wants him
The most terrible of them were filled together
They were taken care of and Ash became a god
The gods called him
प्रजापतिवै स्वां दुहितरमभ्यधावत्
दिवमित्यन्य आहुरुषसमितन्ये
तां रिश्यो भूत्वा रोहितं भूतामभ्यैत्
तं देवा अपश्यन्
“अकृतं वै प्रजापतिः करोति” इति
ते तमैच्छन् य एनमारिष्यति
तेषां या घोरतमास्तन्व् आस्ता एकधा समभरन्
ताः संभृता एष् देवोभवत्
तं देवा अबृवन्
This is the Creator, the unfinished Aka
Kill this, he said, and so be it
He attacked him and shot him
Sa viddha urdhva udaprapatat ( Etarey Brahman 3/333)
अयं वै प्रजापतिः अकृतं अकः
इमं विध्य इति स् तथेत्यब्रवीत्
तं अभ्यायत्य् अविध्यत्
स विद्ध् ऊर्ध्व् उदप्रपतत् ( एतरेय् ब्राहम्ण् 3/333)
*
Verse of Atharvaveda:-
The assembly and the committee are the daughters of the Creator in agreement.
Yena sangaccha up ma sa shikshaat charu vadani pitara: sangateshu.
सभा च मा समितिश्चावतां प्रजापतेर्दुहितौ संविदाने।
येना संगच्छा उप मा स शिक्षात् चारु वदानि पितर: संगतेषु।
Verse of Rigveda :-
The father who gave birth to your daughter, whose semen came from the earth and sprinkled it with her,
पिता यस्त्वां दुहितरमधिष्केन् क्ष्मया रेतः संजग्मानो निषिंचन् ।
The demigods gave birth to Svādhya, who was the father of Vāstoṣpati, who observed vows. (Rigveda -10/61/7)
*स्वाध्योऽजनयन् ब्रह्म देवा वास्तोष्पतिं व्रतपां निरतक्षन् ॥ (ऋगवेद -10/61/7)*
*It is important to know here that in the Vedic period the king was called Prajapati. Sabha and Samiti were considered like daughters of Prajapati. Brahma is also called Prajapati, hence confusion arose. Brahma's daughter Saraswati was white, not red.
*There are different opinions about Saraswati in the Puranas. According to a belief, Brahma had revealed them from his mouth. According to another mythological mention, the Satva dominant form which originated from Goddess Mahalakshmi (not Lakshmi), the same form of the Goddess was called Saraswati. Goddess Saraswati's complexion is white. Goddess Saraswati is also known as Sharda, Shatarupa, Vani, Vagdevi, Vageshwari and Bharati. Due to the origin of music, she is also the goddess of music. The day of Vasant Panchami is also celebrated as his birth anniversary.
*According to Shri Bhagwatanand Guruji, the word 'Saraswati' has been used for the one who is the presiding deity of knowledge, presiding over knowledge and exists in physical form. The word 'Saraswati' has been used for that energy power. According to the scriptures, just as there are two knowledge or sciences, similarly Saraswati is also two. There is Apara and Para Vidya in Vidya. Apara Vidya was created by Lord Brahma but Para Vidya is believed to be created by Brahma (God).
The one who possesses the knowledge of Apara Vidya is the daughter of Brahmaji who is married to Vishnuji. Saraswati, the wife of Brahmaji, is the presiding deity of Para Vidya. She is the goddess who paves the way to salvation and is the daughter of Mahalakshmi.
There are three mysteries described in the Shakta tradition – Pradhanik, Vaikriti and Mukti. This question, this mystery is described in the Pradhaan Rahasya. According to this mystery, Vishnu and Saraswati were born through Mahalakshmi, that is, Vishnu and Saraswati are sister and brother. This Saraswati is married to Brahmaji and Brahmaji's daughter is married to Vishnuji.
*Manipulation of Puranas?
The Puranas have been greatly tampered with during the medieval and British periods. In two scriptures of Hindu religion, 'Saraswati Purana' and 'Matsya Purana', there is a reference to the marriage of the creator of the universe, Brahma, with Saraswati, as a result of which the first human on this earth, 'Manu', was born. But interpreters of Puranas connect the story of Saraswati's birth with Saraswati who is the wife of Brahma due to which everything has gone wrong. However, today there is a greater need to clarify this confusion by doing research on it. This article does not make any claims.
0 Comments